Explore the Levels of Change Management

Latest Posts Individuals Projects and Initiatives Enterprise Archives

The Role of Project Management in ERP Project Implementation Success

6 Mins

Updated: April 17, 2026

Published: April 15, 2026

A project management professional leading a team meeting focused on ERP project implementation and long‑term ERP success.

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementations are complex, enterprise-wide initiatives that impact processes, data, and, most importantly, how people work. Delivering an ERP system on time and on budget isn’t the most significant challenge; ensuring people adopt it to drive business value is. Successful ERP implementations require project management to guide technical delivery and change management to prepare the organization for new ways of working. In this guide, we explore the importance of project management in ERP implementations and how to integrate it with change management for the best results.

The Importance of Project Management in ERP

Project management is a necessary component in the success of ERP initiatives. Effective project management aligns stakeholders, identifies dependencies, controls scope, and keeps timelines and budgets on track while navigating the inherent complexities in ERP system implementations.

ERP software also plays a powerful role in improving how organizations manage projects post-implementation. By centralizing data, standardizing processes, and improving visibility into resources, costs, and performance, ERPs enable better decision-making, strengthening project management capabilities long after go-live.

Project Management Methodologies & Approaches in ERP

ERP implementation projects require a delivery approach that aligns with the organization’s complexity, risk tolerance and change readiness. The chosen project management methodology influences how teams plan, make decisions, and address issues. ERP projects typically rely on one of the following approaches, or a combination of them:

Traditional Waterfall approach

The Waterfall approach follows a linear, sequential process in which teams must complete each phase before moving to the next. It emphasizes detailed upfront planning, documentation, and milestone management. This approach works best when requirements are well understood, regulatory needs are high, and the organization prioritizes predictability and formal governance structures. The Waterfall approach is particularly effective in large enterprises (10,000+ employees) due to its structured nature.

Agile approach

Agile emphasizes flexibility, with iterative cycles that enable regular reassessment and adaptation. In the context of an ERP implementation, agile is most beneficial in environments where requirements are likely to evolve, and rapid adaptation is necessary for the project to succeed. Agile approaches are most effective in smaller organizations or projects where fast iterations and collaboration are feasible.

Hybrid approach

A hybrid project management approach blends Waterfall with the flexibility of agile, balancing the needs of comprehensive planning with iterative adaptation. It provides an adjustable framework to meet varying project needs. Medium- to large-sized organizations often use a hybrid approach to balance control and flexibility when managing complex, enterprise-wide change, such as an ERP implementation.

Roles and Responsibilities in ERP Project Management

Clear roles and responsibilities are essential in ERP project management, as multiple team members are required to drive project success. Below are the key roles and responsibilities across the technical and people-related aspects of an ERP implementation:

ERP Project Manager

This role is responsible for day-to-day execution and ensuring the project stays aligned with agreed objectives. The ERP Project Manager owns the overall timeline, budget, risk management, and coordination across workstreams.

Executive Sponsor

Prosci research demonstrates that sponsors are so critical to change efforts that they can make or break a project or initiative. The sponsor provides active and visible participation throughout the project, builds a sponsorship coalition, and communicates the change to impacted groups.

Functional Leads

This group represents the needs and priorities of their respective business units. They define requirements, validate process changes, and ensure the ERP software supports real-world operational workflows.

Technical Team

This team ensures the chosen ERP solution is stable, secure, and ready to support business operations at go-live and beyond. They manage the system configuration, integrations, data migration, and technical testing.

Change Management Lead

The change manager or change management team is responsible for stakeholder engagement, organizational readiness, training, communication, and adoption. They focus on the people side of change, ensuring people are prepared to work differently using the new ERP software.

The Challenges of Implementing an ERP System

Research from Prosci’s 2025 Unlocking ERP Implementations revealed that human factors matter 6x more than technical factors in improving ERP benefits. These findings highlight a disconnect between conventional wisdom and reality: people-related challenges outweigh process-related and technical ones.

Below are some of the common challenges faced during ERP implementations:

Poor stakeholder alignment – Misalignment among stakeholder groups leads to conflicting priorities and delayed decision-making. In Prosci’s 2025 Unlocking ERP Implementations research, respondents emphasized the importance of engaging stakeholders early to improve ERP implementation outcomes, second only to improving training, underscoring the criticality of stakeholder engagement and alignment for implementation success.
Inadequate change management – When the people side of change is underfunded, delayed, or missing altogether, ERP implementation projects suffer. Change management is one of five human factors that participants in Prosci’s research identified as drivers of value realization and success.
Resistance from end-users – Resistance is a natural human reaction to change. Prosci research shows that preventing resistance to change is more effective than addressing it reactively. Following a change management approach supports the prevention and management of resistance.
Scope creep – Uncontrolled changes to requirements can derail timelines and budgets. Without strong governance, small additions compound into significant delivery risk.
Data migration issues – Poor data quality, unclear ownership, and late validation contribute to disruptions during testing and go-live, causing timeline delays.
Underestimating testing effort – ERP testing requires significant time, coordination, and business involvement. Inadequate testing increases the risk of defects, process breakdowns, and operational disruptions post–go-live.
Lack of reporting and visibility – Limited insight into project status, risks, and adoption metrics makes it difficult to intervene early and get implementations back on track.

Two colleagues collaborating at a desk, reviewing content on a laptop while discussing ideas in an office setting.

Integrating Change Management with Project Management in ERP

Integrating change management with project management in ERP implementations is crucial for achieving successful outcomes. While project management focuses on delivering the system, change management ensures the organization is ready to adopt and sustain new ways of working.

Benefits of early integration

Project management and change management are complementary disciplines with a common objective: to meet or exceed project objectives and realize organizational benefits. Prosci's research demonstrates that organizations integrating these disciplines report higher success rates in meeting or exceeding project objectives. A successful change is characterized by a solution that is effectively designed, developed and delivered (project management) and that is embraced, adopted and used by impacted employees (change management).

Prosci’s Unified Value Proposition illustrates how project management and change management work together to create successful change.

Unified Value Proposition

Need for stakeholder engagement

ERP implementations impact many stakeholders across the organization, making structured stakeholder engagement planning essential. All stakeholders, from executives to employees, can influence whether a change initiative thrives or falters.

Change management helps teams identify impacted groups and assess how the change impacts them. When stakeholder engagement is coordinated with project milestones, teams are better able to coach those in core change management roles to fulfill their responsibilities and help prepare, equip, and support people during change.

Clear communication

Effective communication bridges the gap between ERP implementation technical milestones and organizational understanding. Project updates often focus solely on timelines and deliverables. Change management ensures that messaging explains why the organization is implementing the ERP solution and how it will affect employees' daily work. Aligning communication plans with project phases helps reduce uncertainty and keeps stakeholders informed and engaged throughout the ERP implementation.

Organizational readiness

Project management measures system readiness, which is critical for ensuring the solution delivers the intended technical results. But change management measures change readiness, a crucial aspect in understanding whether the organization is ready, willing and able to adopt new ways of working and implement change. Without organizational readiness, even the best-laid ERP implementation project management plans will fail, as adoption success is people-dependent.

Best Practices for Project Management in ERP

The following best practices help ERP project teams deliver successful implementations with changed ways of working, beyond go-live, to increase value realization:

Prioritize change management and training – Integrating these into the project plan ensures users are prepared to adopt new processes and ways of working. Early and ongoing change management inclusion prevents costly rework and failed implementations.
Define clear scope and success metrics – Prevent scope creep and misaligned expectations by clearly defining what work is in scope and how your organization will measure success.
Use a phased or agile-hybrid approach – Choose an approach that allows teams to manage complexity while adapting to feedback.
Establish strong governance and decision-making – Clear governance structures enable timely decisions and accountability across the project. Strong sponsorship and escalation paths help resolve issues before they impact delivery.
Maintain realistic timelines and budgets – Realistic planning reduces burnout, rework, and the likelihood of cost overruns.
Track KPIs throughout the ERP project lifecycle – Monitoring KPIs such as schedule performance, defect rates, and adoption readiness provides early visibility into risks.
Leverage ERP-specific project management tools – Tools designed for ERP implementations simplify dependency management, progress tracking, and escalation pathing.

Integrating Project Management and Change Management for ERP Implementation Success

When project management and change management operate together, ERP systems are not just deployed; they are adopted, embedded, and leveraged to drive measurable business value. Change done right is how we create better business outcomes.

FAQs

How long does an ERP project take?

The length of an ERP implementation varies based on organizational size, scope, and complexity. Often, ERP implementations are multi-year-long. While there are no right or wrong answers regarding implementation timing, realistic scheduling is critical. Planning conservatively is necessary for delivering working systems and changed behavior.

What are the biggest ERP implementation risks?

Based on Prosci’s 2025 Unlocking ERP Implementations research, the top ERP implementation risks are human factors, including inadequate or incomplete training, stakeholder misalignment, lack of structured change management, unclear communication, and insufficient cross-functional collaboration.

What are some common metrics to measure the success of the ERP integration?

System uptime, data accuracy, process efficiency, user adoption rates, and training completion are some common metrics for measuring the success of ERP integration. It’s essential to evaluate system performance and organizational adoption, in line with business goals, to achieve the best results.

How can organizations ensure effective communication during ERP projects?

Effective communication requires planning, consistency, and role-specific messaging from preferred senders. Regular updates aligned with project milestones, the reasons for change, and opportunities to provide feedback keep stakeholders informed and engaged.

Why is integrating change management with project management important in ERP implementations?

Integrating change management ensures that adoption, readiness, and behavioral changes are addressed alongside technical delivery. This alignment helps the organization realize the intended business benefits of the ERP system.

How does change management contribute to the success of an ERP project?

Change management prepares people for new processes, tools, and ways of working. By focusing on stakeholder engagement, training, and communication, it ensures that users are ready, willing, and able to adopt the ERP system.

Change Done Right Starts Here Accelerate adoption, minimize disruption, and maximize ROI on your must-win projects while building lasting organizational change capability.

Prosci

As the global leader in change management, Prosci helps organizations turn complex change into something people understand—so they can act with confidence and deliver results. Built on more than 30 years of research, Prosci partners with enterprises to scale change, enable adoption, and realize outcomes across complex transformations, including ERP and AI. Our work brings clarity and structure to change, helping leaders move from strategy to action and ensure results endure. That’s what change done right looks like.

See all posts from Prosci

Unified Value Proposition of Change Management and Project Management Integration

The disciplines of change management and project management cross paths throughout the execution of a project or initiative. Each brings necessary and critical structure for effectively implementing change and realizing results. Change management and project management, in a combined effort, present a unified value proposition for achieving successful change by providing a foundation for the tactical integration at the people, process and tool dimensions. Foundation of Integration Change, at its most basic level, is about moving from a current state through a transition state to arrive at a future state. The goal of change is to improve performance in some meaningful way so that performance levels of the future state are better than what was the current state. Organizations both in the public and private sectors introduce projects or initiatives as ways to add structure to change. The movement from the current to the future state occurs on two dimensions: From a technical perspective: a solution that will address the issue or opportunity must be designed, developed and delivered into the organization From a people side perspective: a solution that will truly deliver results must be embraced, adopted and used by those groups impacted by the solution Complementary Disciplines With a Common Objective Project management and change management are complementary disciplines because they each provide focus, processes and tools for moving through the transition toward the future state. The common objective, in times of change, is to improve the performance of the organization with a project or initiative—to reach a desired future state. A successful change is characterized by a solution that is effectively designed, developed and delivered (project management) and that is embraced, adopted and used by impacted employees (change management). Without an approach for both the technical side and people side of change, organizations are unable to deliver sustainable results through change. The Unified Value Proposition of applying both project management and change management is actually quite simple: delivering intended improvement through successfully implemented change programs. Proposition Value In addition to the value of integrating the disciplines, there is further value to change management practitioners in sharing this Unified Value Proposition. How does presenting a joint value proposition help your efforts at change management? Presenting a joint value proposition: 1. Strengthens Your Case for Change Management With the joint value proposition, you are better able to get a seat at the table and be involved in early discussions, focusing your conversation on what your audience really cares about: meeting objectives, staying on budget and finishing on time. 2. Contributes Positively to the Perception of Change Management by Project Teams Prosci's benchmarking research indicates that many change management practitioners are working with project teams that perceive change management as extraneous, which is a major obstacle to project team engagement. With a concrete Unified Value Proposition, you have a foundation for shifting the conversation and overcoming this negative perception. 3. Appeals to the Desire of Project Teams for Structure and Process By demonstrating that change management is not just soft and fluffy but in fact is the application of a structured process and set of tools aimed at delivering project results, you can begin speaking the same language as the project teams you are engaging. 4. Identifies a Problem While Proposing a Solution The problem, in this case, is that projects are consistently failing to realize their full benefits, despite having a well-developed and planned technical solution. A perfectly designed technical solution with low adoption and engagement by end users does not deliver value. The solution presented by the joint value proposition is a holistic approach to benefit realization resulting from an integration of project management and change management. Research and experience shows that meeting objectives on time and on budget results from a solution that is designed, developed and delivered effectively and embraced, adopted and used by impacted employees. By integrating change management and project management in a seamless application, you solve the problem of projects failing to deliver results even when meeting technical requirements. Project management and change management each contribute a critical ingredient to successful change. Although they vary in terms of focus and approach, each are essential in order to navigate the transition state to reach a future state. Successful change ultimately depends on a solution that is effectively designed, developed and delivered and in turn is also embraced, adopted and used proficiently by employees impacted by the change.

Overview of Change Management and Project Management Integration

Change management is not an event. It is a process of helping individuals understand, internalize and support a change. The challenge for project teams is to effectively integrate change management with their project management activities. Change management can be applied to many types of business improvement programs—from radical changes like BPR, mergers and acquisitions or new product releases to incremental changes like continuous improvement processes or Six Sigma. Applying the process and tools for addressing the people side of change involves communications, sponsorship, coaching, training, resistance management and other activities, which must be integrated with the project management plan to be effective. Conceptual Business Improvement and Change Management Processes To see how integration takes place, we begin by looking at a conceptual picture of a business improvement process and a change management process. Although the pictures below show high-level steps, most business improvement processes (TQM, BPR, Six Sigma, reorganization, etc.) contain the five steps below. Likewise, while the change management process will vary and be more complicated than shown below, these five areas represent some of the major activities of change management. Business improvement process Change management process Your Starting Point Changes What You Do First If you begin change management when you begin your project, you are able to integrate the change management steps into the project steps. This is shown conceptually below in Scenario 1. Scenario 1 Integration primarily occurs in one of two ways. First, someone from your team (like you) introduces the importance of change management and the people side of change at the project initiation. Alternatively, your organization makes a commitment to building change capabilities and uses change management as standard practice on every project. When change management is started at the beginning of a project, the activities can be fully integrated. Your first step will be to develop a change management strategy based on the characteristics of your particular change and the attributes of your organization that is being changed. Change readiness assessments will help you decide on your strategy and how you will customize the change management plans you are going to develop. Scenario 2 Unfortunately, change management is often added on to a project after it is well underway. The project team may be preparing for implementation or it may have already started, and the catalyst for using change management is resistance from employees, supervisors and managers. In this situation, your project has already begun to experience difficulties, including productivity declines, resistant behaviors, and possible loss of valued employees—all of which can be prevented or minimized when you integrate change management from the very beginning of a project or initiative. When adding change management late, your first activity is to find out what has already happened. You must take the pulse of the organization, identify the source of resistance, why it has emerged and manage it effectively and quickly. After you have controlled the damage that is already done, you move into the change management process and develop a strategy for the rest of the project. Change Management Activities to Integrate The Prosci 3-Phase Process is a research-based, repeatable and scalable process that guides change practitioners and change teams through the change management approach and activities across three phases. The change management activities to integrate take place across three distinct phases: Phase 1 – Prepare Approach includes planning activities that culminate in the Change Management Strategy, which informs the activities in Phase 2 – Manage Change. Typical activities include defining success and impacts, completing assessments, anticipating resistance, and defining the overall change management approach for the project or initiative. Phase 2 – Manage Change is where the bulk of change management takes place and includes actions and activities that culminate in a Master Change Management Plan. These activities include developing specific plans for activating key roles for their responsibilities during change, tracking and measuring performance over time, and adapting actions and activities to ensure that the project or initiative stays on track. Phase 3 – Sustain Outcomes is all about ensuring that outcomes, such as adoption and usage, can be maintained over time. During this phase, the change team celebrates successes with employees, transfers ownership to the people and teams who will be responsible going forward, and officially ends the change management effort. The final deliverable is the Change Management Closeout. Integrate Change Management and Project Management Whether you start change management at project initiation or later in the project lifecycle, integrating change management and project management is critical. Prosci research consistently shows that aligning key phases and activities throughout the project lifecycle improves your likelihood of more successful outcomes and bringing in your projects on time and within budget.