When done well, digital adoption turns technology investment into measurable business value. It is the shift from implementation to consistent, proficient use of digital tools in the digital workflows that matter. Strong digital adoption aligns people, process, and data so companies can scale transformation without relying on workarounds.
What is digital adoption?
Digital adoption is the people-side of digital transformation. Individuals consistently use digital tools to complete the right digital workflows with the right quality so the business outcomes in the strategy are achieved. In practice, it is sustained use of a digital solution that changes how work gets done, measured in behavi...
ERP Change Management
What is change management in ERP implementations? Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are the backbone of large organizations. They orchestrate complex processes across critical departments, from finance to supply chain management. Unfortunately, many ERP systems are outdated, hampering the ability to reduce costs and drive revenue. Financial and IT executives are heavily involved in selecting and integrating new ERPs—but that’s only half the battle. Leaders often forget the role that change management plays in ERP lifecycles. Technology changes begin with process changes. ERP change management is a structured approach that empowers employees to embrace the process changes and new systems faster and more efficiently. The result is that individuals, teams, and organizations move from the current state to your desired future state and then use the updated ERP systems in their daily work. × Your ERP Will Go Live. Will it Deliver Value? Why enterprises need ERP change management ERPs are expensive, complex systems ingrained in your organization’s digital infrastructure. That means your workforce has built strong habits surrounding legacy systems across various business functions. The interconnected nature of ERPs and high employee resistance to change create an environment where progress is slow and efficient change is difficult. For example, not having enough staff for the project is a major reason why costs exceed the budget, which happens for 38.4% of organizations. This highlights just how crucial it is to manage changes effectively. According to leading ERP vendor Oracle, companies face a number of key challenges during ERP adoption and implementation: Project management and planning – ERP implementations involve multiple phases, from discovery and planning to testing, deployment and post-launch analysis. Many organizations underestimate the time and resources necessary for this change. Data integration and quality – Duplicate data sources represent a logistical and administrative challenge, while moving data can represent as much as 15% of the total ERP cost. Cost and timeline overruns – ERPs are notorious for expanding budgets and lagging milestones. Few companies have the internal resources to plan for and drive this level of organizational change. (only 49.7% of projects meet their original timelines, and the median project duration extends to 15.5 months) Effective change management – Switching to a new software is par for the course. Driving adoption and overcoming resistance to change among key stakeholders adds another layer of complexity. A study from Panorama Consulting Group shows — executives who invest in a change management methodology are 33% more likely to achieve “good” or “excellent” outcomes from their transition than those who don’t. These are all symptoms of underinvestment in proven change management methodologies. This highlights a major point that CIOs and CFOs must be aware of prior to the change: Building change capacity using a specific methodology significantly increases the chances of a successful ERP implementation. Impact of use of a methodology on overall change management effectiveness Change management for ERP implementation case study Hear firsthand from EisnerAmper's change leaders on how they executed an integrated change management strategy for a complex ERP transformation touching 3,300+ employees. During this panel discussion, the program director, change lead, and CFO give an inside look into their 18-month journey of sunsetting legacy platforms and rolling out four new integrated systems, including SAP. How EisnerAmper executed a complex ERP rollout and built lasting change capability Key steps in EisnerAmper's change management journey: Integrating change management and project management – The team leveraged outputs of project milestones like solution design workshops to inform impact assessments and change plans. Bridging the Knowledge to Ability gap with user acceptance testing (UAT) – UAT and training were conducted in partnership between project management and change management to ready employees. Defining success metrics that matter – The team identified customized metrics to track adoption and usage indicators tailored to each impacted group rather than a one-size-fits-all model. Securing buy-in and preparing for resistance – In-person roadshows across 16 office locations proved invaluable for securing leadership commitment while addressing employee concerns. Supporting with a strategic communication approach – A multichannel communications strategy catered to varied preferences for consuming information and building desire for change. The Prosci Methodology: A holistic approach to ERP change management Prosci has more than 30 years of experience helping organizations across industries drive successful change, from undertaking large-scale digital transformation to implementing new initiatives. In that time, Prosci developed a proven set of tools for driving enterprise change, culminating in the Prosci Methodology. The Prosci Methodology is a structured yet flexible approach to managing the people side of change. It consists of two key components that lay the foundation for successful long-term change: ADKAR® Model – a model for guiding individuals through the five building blocks necessary to achieve successful change: Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability and Reinforcement Prosci 3-Phase Process – a dynamic framework for driving change at the organizational level through three key phases: Phase 1 – Prepare Approach, Phase 2 – Manage Change, and Phase 3 – Sustain Outcomes The Prosci Methodology Successful ERP implementation requires substantial buy-in across the organization. However, the actions of specific stakeholders across IT, Finance, and HR are critical. That’s why you need a holistic approach to ERP change management that connects the micro to the macro. How Prosci drives ERP adoption across enterprise contexts Prosci works with large-scale enterprises across industries, helping them successfully navigate complex transitions. Over the past 30 years, Prosci has helped companies from large multinationals to critical utility companies. Here’s how the Prosci Methodology improves ERP adoption: An international entertainment company's ERP change management success A rapidly growing international entertainment company faced the challenge of implementing a complex, long-lifecycle ERP system — its previous large-scale change attempts had been unsuccessful. Having grown from 500 to 1,200 employees in a short period, the stakes were high. The organization engaged Prosci to ensure this initiative delivered real results. Key steps in the entertainment company's ERP transformation: Building change capability across the enterprise — Prosci provided customized training to more than 60 personnel in change management methodology and established a community of practice to build knowledge and ability across the organization. Using data to navigate complexity — Eight Prosci Change Triangle (PCT) Assessments and ADKAR surveys tracked project health throughout the multi-year lifecycle, enabling the team to identify and address barriers early — including low scores that signaled a threat to project success before they escalated. Activating sponsors — Sponsor Briefings helped executive and management teams understand their roles, building credibility and lasting change capability that extended beyond this project. Delivering tailored solutions — Custom training for sponsors and sponsor coalitions was delivered in phased increments over several months. A hypercare reinforcement plan provided additional support post-go-live and transferred sustainment ownership to the business. Sustaining outcomes — A comprehensive communications strategy — including all-company meetings, weekly email support, and executive-level communications at key milestones — maintained alignment and desire for change throughout implementation. The ERP rollout was deemed a success. The organization moved from 500 to 1,200 change-capable employees, with 86% improvement in project success. Following the ERP initiative, the Entertainment Company engaged Prosci for another enterprise-wide change initiative — a strong indicator of the value delivered and the partnership established. Read the full International Entertainment Company success story A multinational food corporation's SAP implementation A US-based multinational food corporation faced the challenge of updating its systems infrastructure to support an ambitious growth plan. This involved a new SAP implementation aimed at consolidating six legacy systems into one, streamlining payments, reducing errors, and providing more detailed data for better business decisions. The project, impacting 500 users across various departments, required a significant mindset shift and was complicated by an acquisition mid-flight. Key steps in the SAP implementation: Starting with why – The goal was to improve efficiency and decision-making capabilities through a unified system. Identifying impacted processes – Understanding the processes affected by the new SAP system was crucial for targeted change management. Engaging stakeholders – The change lead engaged in direct conversations with impacted individuals, especially those resistant to the new system, transforming them into supporters and trainers. Integrating change and project management – The change team worked closely with the project team, ensuring alignment and effective collaboration. Metrics and measurement – Tools like the Prosci Change Triangle (PCT) Model and Best Practices Audit from Prosci tracked project health and adherence to best practices. Building a change agent network – A network of 40 change agents facilitated the change process and served as a feedback loop. The SAP implementation was successfully launched on time, achieving its objectives despite the mid-project acquisition. The project exceeded expectations by eliminating legacy systems, streamlining payment processes, and providing granular data for improved decision-making. It also automated and streamlined previously manual processes. The success of this SAP implementation served as a benchmark for future projects, demonstrating the lasting impact of Prosci's change management approach in complex ERP implementations. The focus on the people side of change was key to exceeding project goals and setting a new standard for organizational change initiatives. Read the full Multinational Food Corporation success story Sunflower Electric Power Corporation's ERP change management success Sunflower Electric's experience with Prosci shows what's possible when the people side of change gets the same attention as the technical side. Faced with the challenge of implementing a new ERP system, Sunflower Electric partnered with Prosci to navigate this complex change. The key to their success was addressing the people side of change as much as the technical side. Key steps in Sunflower Electric’s ERP transformation: Starting with why – Understanding the purpose behind the ERP implementation was crucial. For Sunflower Electric, it was about improving efficiencies and gaining a better organizational view. Identifying impacted processes – By identifying which processes were impacted by the new ERP system, Sunflower Electric could focus on the areas needing the most attention. Connecting change to business results – Using Prosci's 4 P's (Project, Purpose, Particulars and People), the connection between the ERP project and organizational benefits was made clear. Assessing and managing risks – Evaluating and addressing risks was essential, especially considering the organization's previous experiences with ERP implementations. Engaging stakeholders – Through stakeholder meetings and surveys, Sunflower Electric engaged employees, building awareness and desire for the ERP change. Integrating change management and project management – Despite joining the project late, change management was seamlessly integrated, ensuring alignment with project goals. The results at Sunflower Electric were remarkable. The change management strategy led to increased awareness and desire for the new ERP system among employees. Impacted people found the training materials helpful, and the overall project was deemed a success, leading to a broader rollout of the Prosci Methodology and ADKAR Model across the organization. Success at Sunflower Electric didn't end with the ERP implementation. The project served as a catalyst for building holistic change management capabilities within the organization, demonstrating the lasting value of Prosci's approach. Read the full Sunflower Electric success story Make Your ERP Implementation a Success With Prosci The return on your ERP investment depends on one thing above all others: whether your people adopt and use the new system. According to Prosci's Unlocking ERP Implementations research, human factors matter six times more than technical factors in realizing ERP benefits — making the people side of change the highest-leverage investment you can make. Your ERP implementation deserves more than a successful go-live. It deserves lasting adoption. Prosci brings 30+ years of research-backed methodology, proven tools, and experienced consultants to help your organization get there. Ready to make change done right a reality? Contact Prosci today.
Organizational AI Readiness
Many organizations are making big bets on artificial intelligence (AI) adoption based on instinct: assuming employees will adopt because they have to, excitement at the leadership level, or a few successful pilots. But assumptions aren’t enough to gauge an organization's actual AI readiness. Without a clear understanding of how prepared people, processes, and governance are, organizations risk overestimating AI readiness, underestimating constraints, and investing in AI while failing to achieve adoption. Organizational AI readiness encourages executives and leaders to look beyond tools and infrastructure alone before proceeding with AI implementations. In this guide, we explain the significance of organizational AI readiness, how to assess it, and why change management is critical for building it. × 10 Workplace Conditions That Help Individuals Excel in AI Adoption Why is organizational AI readiness important? Organizational AI readiness is critical because the success of AI initiatives depends far more on whether the organization’s people are prepared to adopt, trust, and use it than on the AI technologies themselves. Many enterprises are investing heavily in AI tools but fail to realize value due to unclear strategy, poor data quality, skill gaps, or cultural resistance. Prosci research shows that AI tools are often perceived as easy to use and valuable, yet adoption still varies by role. For example, executives report higher trust (+1.09) and ease of use (+1.19) than frontline workers. Readiness ensures the right foundations are in place, including executive behavior — one of the strongest predictors of whether AI initiatives stall or scale, according to our research. Without organizational AI readiness, companies risk stalled initiatives, low adoption, and missed opportunities for efficiency, insight, and competitive advantage. The 6 core pillars of organizational AI readiness The following six core pillars build AI readiness in organizations: 1. Data, governance and privacy AI is only as effective as the data it relies on, making strong data governance and privacy practices foundational to readiness. Teams must prioritize data accuracy, accessibility, security, and compliance with regulatory requirements, while also establishing clear policies for using data to train AI models. Without this foundation, AI outputs become unreliable, and trust in AI technologies erodes. Microsoft offers a variety of Responsible AI tools and practices to help make informed decisions about data compliance and management. 2. Leadership vision and strategy A clear, compelling vision from leadership sets the direction for how AI will create value across the organization. This includes defining priority use cases, aligning AI initiatives to business outcomes, and communicating how artificial intelligence supports the broader strategy. Microsoft’s AI Impact Assessment Guide and Responsible AI Impact Assessment Template support teams in working through AI system use cases and challenges, encouraging consideration of potential benefits and harms. Without strong leadership alignment and direction, AI efforts tend to remain fragmented, experimental, and disconnected from business impact. 3. Talent and skill development AI readiness requires a broader skills uplift across the organization. This includes data literacy, understanding how to work with AI tools, and building specialized capabilities in data science, engineering, and AI governance to support tool development and management. Without the right talent and skill development, organizations struggle to scale AI beyond isolated use cases. 4. Technology capabilities and implementation approach A robust and scalable technology ecosystem is essential to support artificial intelligence development and deployment. This includes infrastructure considerations, data platforms, integration capabilities, and access to appropriate AI tools. Readiness means ensuring that systems can support experimentation and regular usage without creating bottlenecks or technical debt. 5. Cultural behaviors and mindset Organizational culture plays a decisive role in whether AI is embraced or resisted. A culture that encourages experimentation, learning, and data-driven decision-making will accelerate adoption, while fear, skepticism, or lack of trust can stall progress. Building readiness requires addressing mindset, promoting responsible use, and creating an environment where people feel confident engaging with AI. 6. Distributed, cross-functional ownership AI readiness requires shared ownership across business, technology, risk, and operations functions. Cross-functional collaboration ensures that AI solutions are practical, compliant, and aligned with real business needs. Without distributed ownership, initiatives often become siloed, limiting both enterprise-wide adoption and long-term scalability. How to assess your organizational AI readiness Here’s how you can assess AI readiness in your organization: Step 1: Segment the organization by roles or levels Break the organization into key groups, such as executives, people managers, team leaders, and frontline employees, so you can see where readiness differs by level. Doing so helps teams avoid overlooking important gaps worth further consideration. Prosci’s AI research shows that perceptions and experiences vary by role, so segmentation is essential to get an accurate picture and identify targeted solutions for each group. Step 2: Assess readiness across key dimensions For each segment, quickly score the conditions that enable successful AI adoption, especially: Governance and control – How clearly rules, guardrails, and decision rights are understood and experienced at different levels AI implementation approach – Whether people see AI as strategic and coordinated vs. reactive and ad hoc, and whether their level is involved in shaping use cases or just receiving tools Organizational dynamics – Perception differences between levels in the organization Training and capability-building – Gaps in role-based education, coaching, and hands-on learning opportunities for building confidence to use AI effectively This gives you a readiness scorecard that covers both organizational and human factors, not just technology. Step 3: Identify your top readiness constraints Review your readiness scores and determine the two most significant bottlenecks that will limit adoption and value realization. These often include things like low proficiency, lack of transparency, or unbalanced governance. Focusing on the top constraints prevents you from trying to fix everything at once or spreading your efforts thin. Step 4: Pick targeted interventions Choose actions that directly address those constraints for the right segments. For a group demonstrating low proficiency, consider role-based training and hands-on learning opportunities. Where transparency is lacking, design a transparent communications campaign to build trust. Or, in segments with unbalanced governance, try a tiered governance approach to enable safe experimentation. Once you choose your targeted interventions, assign owners and set timing (often in a 30-60-90-day plan) for measurable, actionable improvements. The role of change management in organizational AI readiness Change management plays a direct role in organizational AI readiness. When organizations expect value from AI investments, they need to answer this question: Will people adopt and use AI effectively, consistently, and ethically to deliver outcomes? Making AI tools available is one thing, but transforming human behavior and changing the ways they work through change management is what drives actual results. Prosci’s AI adoption research reinforces this: human factors account for 56–64% of AI implementation difficulties, and the most common challenge is user proficiency (38%). Change management makes AI readiness real by turning AI strategy and governance into employee adoption, proficiency and sustained use, where the value is actually realized. Organizational AI readiness challenges Many organizations unintentionally limit the impact of AI by focusing too narrowly on tools, while overlooking the people, culture, and governance needed to sustain change. The challenges below highlight the most common patterns that stall AI adoption. Treating AI readiness as a technology checklist only – This is the most critical barrier because it becomes the root cause of many other challenges. When leaders frame readiness as a purely technical exercise — focused on tools, platforms, and infrastructure — they underinvest in change management, communication, leadership behavior, and culture. But human factors are the majority of AI implementation challenges. Rolling out AI reactively without a proactive roadmap – Without a clear business strategy, AI rollouts are reactive, often in response to urgent problems or vendor pressure. This leads to fragmented pilots, inconsistent adoption, and difficulty demonstrating value, making AI feel experimental and disjointed. One-size-fits-all training – Generic, tool-focused training often fails to address the specific ways different roles will use AI in their day-to-day work. When organizations don’t provide training by role, proficiency level, and use case, employees struggle to translate concepts into practice, leading to low confidence, uneven adoption, and missed opportunities for impact. Not addressing perception gaps between executives and frontline employees – Prosci research shows that executives typically report higher trust and ease of use with AI than frontline employees. When organizations overlook these differences, they risk widening perception gaps: leaders may assume readiness is high based on their own experience, while frontline employees feel uncertain, skeptical, or left behind. Over-indexing on control or under-governing – Overly restrictive policies and complex approval processes can shut down experimentation and slow learning, while weak governance exposes the organization to privacy, security, and ethical risks. Clear guardrails with room to test and learn are essential to building confidence and enabling responsible AI innovation. How to improve organizational AI readiness Improving organizational AI readiness doesn’t require a massive transformation all at once; it starts with a focused, 90-day effort to create clarity, build capability, and scale what works. The phases below outline a practical 30-60-90-day framework you can adapt to your organization’s context and pace. First 30 days: Create clarity and alignment In the first 30 days, the priority is to align leaders and employees on why AI matters, where it will be used, and how decisions will be made. Start by building a simple, living AI roadmap that outlines priority use cases, business outcomes, and key milestones, rather than a detailed multi-year plan you’ll never revisit. At the same time, establish governance that balances risk management with flexibility, including clear guardrails, decision rights, and escalation paths that still leave room for experimentation. Finally, lead with transparency in AI-related decisions. Explain why certain tools are being introduced, how data will be used, and what’s expected of each role, so trust is built from the start. Days 31-60: Build capability and repeatability The next 30 days focus on building the skills, tools, and repeatable practices that make AI real in daily work. Expand AI literacy across the organization with role-based training that helps people understand both the opportunities and limitations of AI, not just how to use specific tools. Begin creating an AI use case library that documents examples of where AI is working well, what outcomes it’s driving, and lessons learned, making it easier for other teams to replicate success. Make ethics a visible priority by integrating responsible AI principles into training, decision criteria, and project reviews. Most importantly, ensure AI is usable in day-to-day workflows by embedding it into existing tools and processes, reducing friction so employees don’t have to access separate systems. Days 61-90: Scale what works responsibly In the final 30 days, the focus shifts to scaling successful patterns while reinforcing trust and responsibility. Institutionalize transparency and two-way involvement through forums, feedback loops, and communication channels that allow employees to see how AI decisions are made and to contribute their experiences and concerns. Continue to make ethics a priority by formalizing review mechanisms, monitoring for unintended consequences, and adjusting guidelines as new use cases emerge. Evolve the organization's governance to differentiate between low and high-risk use cases. This evolution enables the organization to scale AI confidently while staying aligned with its values, risk tolerance, and regulatory requirements. FAQs How do you measure AI readiness? AI readiness is measured by assessing both the technical and human conditions required for successful adoption. That includes data quality and governance, leadership vision, skills and training, cultural attitudes toward AI, and the clarity of roles, responsibilities, and guardrails. A structured assessment segments by role or level and scores each group across these dimensions to reveal where the organization is ready and where targeted interventions are needed. What is a key challenge in organizational AI readiness? A key challenge is treating AI readiness as a technology checklist instead of an organizational change. When leaders focus primarily on tools and infrastructure, they underinvest in human factors such as communication, role-based training, and executive behavior. As Prosci research shows, these human elements account for the majority of challenges in AI projects, making their neglect a major barrier to adoption and impact. What is an organizational AI readiness assessment? An organizational AI readiness assessment is a structured way to evaluate your organization's preparedness to adopt, scale, and govern AI responsibly. It typically segments the organization by role or level, then scores each segment across dimensions such as governance and control, AI project approach, organizational dynamics, and training and capability-building. The output is a readiness scorecard that highlights strengths, gaps, and the most critical constraints to address. Why is change management in organizational AI readiness important? Change management is essential because AI value only materializes when people actually use AI tools effectively, consistently, and ethically. Making technology available doesn’t guarantee behavior change. Employees need clarity, support, and reinforcement to integrate AI into how they work. Prosci’s research shows that human factors account for 56–64% of AI implementation challenges, with user proficiency as the most common issue (38%), underscoring the critical role of change management in AI readiness. How should leaders communicate about AI to improve readiness? Leaders should communicate about AI early, often, and transparently, focusing on the why behind the change and what it means for different roles. That includes explaining how AI supports the organization’s strategy, what guardrails and ethics standards are in place, and how different roles are expected to use AI. Leaders should invite questions, listen to concerns, and close the loop by showing how feedback is shaping AI decisions and governance. Building Organizational AI Readiness for Better Change Adoption When organizations combine thoughtful governance, strong leadership, and intentional investments in people, AI becomes an integrated, trusted capability that advances performance, resilience and competitive advantage. That’s how organizations make AI transformations feel both possible and worthwhile.
Editor's Choice
Why Projects Fail: Common Causes and How to Prevent Project Failure
Projects fail more often than organizations like to admit, and rarely for one reason. Missed deadlines, budget overruns, and low adoption rates are symptoms of deeper issues: poor leadership, inadequate planning, ineffective communication, and a lack of change management.Understanding why projects fail is critical for improving project outcomes and avoiding repeat mistakes. By addressing both delivery and the human side of change, teams organize and complete projects that deliver lasting value and build change-ready organizations along the way. In this guide, we explore the most common causes of project failure, the role of change management in project success, and practical steps organizations and project managers can take to reduce risk and achieve the outcomes they hope for in every new initiative. × Overcome the 4 most common project management challenges The Importance of Understanding Project Failure Understanding why projects fail is critical to preventing similar situations in the future. When organizations look beyond surface-level issues, such as missed timelines and budget overruns, they can identify recurring root causes and address them proactively through systemic changes. This insight allows project managers and teams to plan more effectively, communicate risks earlier, and increase the likelihood of project success with each new initiative. Assessing project failure also builds credibility and trust with stakeholders. Openly acknowledging what went wrong strengthens transparency, improves communication, and aligns teams around more realistic expectations. Most importantly, it enables organizational learning, turning failed or struggling projects into valuable development opportunities that build stronger, more resilient teams. 8 Common Causes of Project Failure Project failures rarely stem from a single issue. Understanding the most common causes of project failure helps organizations recognize early warning signs and take corrective action to get the project back on track. 1. Poorly defined goals When project goals are vague, conflicting, or poorly understood, teams lack a common goalpost to work toward. Without clear objectives and a shared definition of success defined in the project charter, team members may struggle to prioritize the project alongside other responsibilities, make well-informed decisions, or measure their progress. Over time, ambiguity leads to significant gaps in misalignment and wasted effort. 2. Scope creep No project is immune to scope creep. When stakeholders add requirements without a proper evaluation or approval process, scope creep occurs, even when the additions are small. Despite good intentions, unmanaged scope changes can increase complexity, deplete resources, delay schedules, and introduce unforeseen or missed dependencies. Without strong governance, slight changes accumulate into significant project delivery risk. 3. Inadequate planning and unrealistic timelines Compressed project schedules and insufficient planning create undue pressure, undermining high-quality outcomes and team morale. When teams set project timelines without accounting for factors such as dependencies, risk management, and organizational readiness, they end up executing reactively and under pressure. This often results in rework, missed milestones, and burnout. 4. Weak leadership Too many leaders make the mistake of initiating or assigning a project and removing themselves from the picture, expecting teams to complete the work in their absence. But projects need visible, engaged leadership to provide direction, make timely decisions, and remove barriers. Weak sponsorship and unclear accountability leave teams without the necessary authority to resolve issues and keep the project moving. 5. Communication breakdown Poor communication leads to misaligned expectations, confusion, risks, and frustration among project team members. When stakeholders miss or don’t receive essential updates, they get left behind. When project updates focus solely on tasks and timelines, stakeholders may disengage without a clear understanding of the project's purpose and impact. Communication gaps amplify uncertainty and resistance. 6. Lack of stakeholder engagement When project managers and teams exclude stakeholders from planning and decision-making, teams miss critical insights and inevitably create resistance. Stakeholder engagement is a necessary foundation for starting the project off right. Plus, engaged stakeholders are more likely to support the project and adopt new ways of working when teams include them from the beginning. 7. Insufficient project resources Under-resourcing projects in staffing, skills, or time hinders the team’s ability to deliver successful project results. While a conservative resourcing approach might feel like a win from the project budget perspective, these decisions often do more harm than good. Competing priorities and overloading team members increase errors and lead to severe burnout. Resource constraints rarely reveal themselves until delivery is already at risk. 8. Inflexibility in change Projects fail when organizations treat plans as fixed, even as conditions evolve. Inflexible project planning limits the team’s ability to respond to new information, emerging risks, or shifting business priorities. At the same time, inflexibility in managing change, such as ignoring feedback and assuming people will adapt without an effective change strategy, increases the chances of project failure. Successful projects balance discipline with adaptability, adjusting plans as needed while supporting people through change. How Change Management Impacts Project Success Change management has a direct, measurable impact on project success when teams integrate change management with project management from the outset. While project management focuses on the technical aspects, change management ensures that people affected by the project's changes are prepared to embrace them. A change management approach provides a structured methodology to help individuals transition from the current state to the desired future state. This involves preparing, equipping, and supporting individuals to adopt and use the changes effectively, driving organizational results by engaging employees and inspiring them to adopt new ways of working. Prosci’s Unified Value Proposition model is effective for positioning change management and defining its critical contribution to project and organizational outcomes. The Unified Value Proposition Finally, change management helps teams identify and address resistance to change, enabling smoother transitions and better project outcomes. Projects succeed only when employees change how they work, and change management works alongside project management to increase the chance of success. How to Avoid Project Management Failure Avoiding project failure requires intentional focus and dedication to the technical and people sides of change. While no project is risk-free, organizations that prevent and address common causes of failure early are more likely to achieve better project outcomes. Consider these best practices for avoiding project failure: Define success early – Establish clear objectives and success criteria from the start. Engage stakeholders in defining success and ensure alignment with organizational goals. The 4 P’s Exercise can jumpstart a discussion on change management and why it’s critical for project success. Plan realistically – Develop a structured plan that is realistic, flexible and sustainable. Break projects into manageable phases with clearly defined milestones to recognize and celebrate short-term successes. Engage stakeholders continuously – Build alignment and ownership across stakeholders around a common definition of success. Involve key stakeholders and sponsors early in the project to clarify roles and expectations, both from a technical and change management perspective. Communicate relentlessly – Project managers must start communication early and involve all key stakeholders. Frequent, transparent communication keeps teams aligned and reduces uncertainty. Use structured, innovative communication plans to ensure clear, concise, and frequent communication. Adapt to change – Remain flexible, recognizing that project objectives may shift for various reasons, and use the project’s defined success criteria to guide the work and assess shifting objectives. Prosci’s PCT Model helps teams ensure clarity and alignment on project objectives, enabling organizations to achieve better outcomes. Invest in people, not just plans – Projects succeed when people are prepared to adopt new ways of working. And teams build organizational readiness and change resilience by prioritizing the people side of change. Change-ready organizations equipped with change management expertise are 7x more likely to succeed on must-win projects. Change done right, no matter the project, is critical to business agility. Partner with Prosci when you don’t want your projects to fail because we’ve spent over 25 years studying how organizations and people thrive through transformation. FAQs What is the most common reason projects fail? Typically, multiple factors contribute to project failure, including unclear goals, misalignment among stakeholders, and insufficient budgets and resources. The reasons projects fail also depend on the type of project. For example, technology projects fail because the project isn’t defined enough, there is a lack of leadership and accountability, communication is inefficient, timelines are poor, there is no user testing, or teams are trying to solve the wrong problem. Can agile prevent project failure? Agile can reduce certain project risks related to inflexibility by promoting flexible planning, incorporating feedback, and using incremental delivery. But agile can never entirely prevent project failure, as using agile alone doesn’t address critical success factors such as stakeholder engagement and alignment, or effective communication. Without strong leadership and sponsorship, stakeholder engagement, and a change management approach, projects can still fail, even in agile environments. How often do projects fail? While project failure rates vary by industry and project type, Prosci’s research shows that projects with excellent change management are 7x more likely to achieve their objectives than those with poor change management. This finding highlights the importance of following a structured yet adaptable change management approach to reduce the frequency and severity of project failure. Correlation of Change Management Effectiveness With Meeting Project Objectives What role does change management play in preventing project failure? Change management addresses the people side of change, a necessary aspect of helping individuals move from the current state to the future state. An intentional, well-defined approach to managing change, such as the Prosci Methodology, provides the structure needed to stay on track. It allocates sufficient time for meaningful activities and creates space to identify and address gaps throughout the project lifecycle, addressing risks before the project fails. Why is leadership support crucial for project success? Prosci research shows that projects with extremely ineffective sponsors were only 27% likely to meet their objectives, compared with 79% with extremely effective sponsors. Having a positive leader who actively guides the organization through change and is visibly involved throughout its lifecycle has been the top contributor to success rates since 1998. Correlation of Sponsor Effectiveness With Meeting Objectives
Read story
5 Strategic Decisions for Building Organizational Change Capability in 2026
Twenty-six percent. That's the success rate for transformations that improve performance and sustain results. For enterprise leaders finalizing 2026 budgets, the question isn't whether transformation will happen—it's whether your organization can execute it.Market conditions leave no room for failure. Organizations are running multiple high-stakes transformations simultaneously while 53% of employees report feeling overwhelmed by too much change happening at once. The executives who succeed won't be those who predict the future most accurately. They'll be those who build the capability to adapt quickly regardless of what emerges. We interviewed Prosci's executive leadership team—spanning finance, operations, people, and regional leadership—to understand how they guide enterprise clients through this challenge. Their collective insights reveal five strategic decisions that separate transformation success from budget waste. × × Can You Afford Your Change To Fail? 1. Fund Change Capability Like Infrastructure, Not Projects Most organizations treat change management as a variable project cost. But this approach fails when facing an uncertain 2026 landscape where strategic priorities may shift mid-year. Prosci research shows the financial impact of this decision. Organizations executing excellent change management practices see an 88% success rate in meeting project objectives, compared to only 13% for those with poor change management practices. The difference represents significant value at stake. Correlation of Change Management Effectiveness with Meeting Objectives "No matter what those bets are, they still require that people are changing to actually make that come to life," explains Romona Brown, President of Prosci North America. "That is the piece that's consistent. The adoption still needs to happen to actually get to the ROI." Michelle Haggerty, Prosci's COO, cuts to the core of how executives should reframe this investment: "It's not what can we afford, but how can we afford not to. More now than ever, transformation is happening every single day. It's incredibly important to put intentionality in your relationship with your project management and change management office." Building baseline change capability delivers measurable financial benefits. Once established, it reduces per-project investment while accelerating time-to-value. Organizations avoid starting from zero with each transformation and instead leverage existing organizational muscle memory. 2. Plan for Dual Transformation Realities The transformation challenge has fundamentally changed. Organizations now face continuous AI-driven change alongside discrete strategic projects. A single approach to resourcing and planning won't address both effectively. "You have to do both," says Laura McGann, Chief People Officer at Prosci. "You have to do the ongoing continuous transformation and then you have to get really clear on must-win projects. They overlap 100%, but you actually treat them differently." Haggerty reinforces why this distinction matters: "Transformation isn't about structure and processes. That's a key component, but it's also about behaviors and mindsets. The best leaders really focus on the people side of it and really where execution comes to life is through those humans and their adoption." Business-as-usual changes require workforce adaptability—AI is reshaping daily work, regulations are evolving, market forces are shifting. These changes demand different resource allocation and planning than structured transformation projects like ERP implementations or organizational redesigns. Organizations that apply the same strategy to both underperform on both. 3. Consider People Impact During Budget Planning The sequence matters. Organizations that assess people impact during project planning—not after technology selection—build realistic timelines and avoid late-stage budget overruns. Prosci research on change management maturity shows a clear difference in outcomes based on timing. Organizations that incorporate change management practices from the outset experience a greater success meeting their objectives than those that treat it as an afterthought. Correlation of When Change Management Begins with Meeting Project Objectives "We see in very mature organizations that early into the process as they're planning out initiatives, they're considering the people side impact," notes Randy Herrera, EVP of Global Growth at Prosci. "We also know from our research that change management mature organizations have a higher degree of success on their initiatives." When we asked what sets successful executives apart in their planning approach, Haggerty was direct: "They're really looking beyond the milestones and focusing on outcomes and adoption. Where I see leaders struggle is when they underestimate that human element around adoption." Early adoption planning prevents late-stage budget overruns and schedule delays. The business case is clear. 4. Develop Leaders as Change Capability Multipliers Leadership requirements have evolved beyond traditional project management. Leaders now navigate continuous market change while executing transformation initiatives simultaneously. Prosci research demonstrates the multiplier effect of leadership engagement. Organizations with active executive sponsorship and visible leadership support report a 73% success rate in their change initiatives, compared to only 29% for those lacking such support. Correlation of Sponsor Effectiveness With Meeting Objectives McGann emphasizes this shift: "Being a leader, you are managing that ongoing continuous transformation and change for your team members. Leaders really have to understand that both of those are going to co-exist going forward." When we asked what leadership capabilities matter most during transformation, Haggerty identified three critical components: "Active and visible sponsorship throughout the entire transformation. Building a coalition—making sure that return you're hoping for is a team sport, not something individuals achieve in silos. And communication. Why, why now, what if we don't. Continually repeating those at different elements and milestones." Change-capable leaders become force multipliers who enable adoption across multiple initiatives simultaneously. This approach scales capability without proportional resource increases. 5. Measure Adoption in Real Time, Not Just at Project End CFOs increasingly focus on transformation ROI, but many lack the data and metrics connecting adoption levels to business outcomes. "Getting buy-in across the organization is so important," explains Shelley Pino, CFO at Prosci. "If people don't believe, you are constantly vying for resources and dollars. It's not the most fun place to send your money." Real-time adoption tracking enables course correction before problems compound. Organizations can identify resistance early, adjust approaches mid-stream, and demonstrate incremental value to maintain executive support and resource commitment. Haggerty adds a critical operational perspective: "There's a high level of expectation around data and metrics to measure adoption in real time, not just at the end. That's a key component of successful transformation. You're seeing those adoption metrics, you're seeing return on investment metrics throughout the life cycle, not just hoping they'll be there at the end." Organizations that measure adoption iteratively throughout the transformation lifecycle protect their investments and capture value faster. Turn Change Capability Into Competitive Advantage The organizations thriving in 2026 will be those that invested in change capability during their 2025 planning cycles. They understand a fundamental truth: building change capability isn't about managing individual projects more effectively. It's about organizational resilience that converts uncertainty into competitive advantage. As Haggerty puts it, "You need some space to build in the unpredictable because we know for sure it's coming. We just don't know when or what it will be." The 2026 planning window is closing. Executives who invest in change capability now will lead from strength while competitors scramble to adapt. Prosci's proven methodologies and enterprise solutions help organizations turn the people side of change into a strategic asset. These insights come from conversations with Randy Herrera (EVP Global Growth), Laura McGann (Chief People Officer), Shelley Pino (CFO), Romona Brown (President, Prosci North America), and Michelle Haggerty (COO) conducted in September 2025.
Read story
Build Organizational Resilience: A Strategic Capability for Navigating Change
As today’s business leaders and organizations face continuous transformation driven by new technologies, evolving customer expectations, shifting economic realities, and shifts in workforce preferences, organizational resilience is a necessity rather than a trend. In this article, we explore organizational resilience and strategies for developing resilient teams that view change as an opportunity. What is Organizational Resilience? Organizational resilience refers to an enterprise’s ability to adapt and thrive in the face of change. It’s what allows teams to remain focused, deliver results, and grow stronger through disruption, rather than feeling derailed by it. Building this capability emphasizes the value in equipping employees to respond with confidence, agility, and purpose when change inevitably occurs. Core Pillars of Organizational Resilience Building organizational resilience involves strengthening the core capabilities that allow teams to respond effectively to change. These core pillars create the foundation of a resilient organization: Leadership and vision Organizational resilience requires competent change leaders who can effectively guide professionals through the change process. Leaders who communicate a clear vision and model adaptability set the tone for how the rest of the organization responds to disruption. When employees understand the why behind changes and feel empowered by leaders navigating uncertainty with purpose, they’re more likely to stay aligned and motivated through transformational change. Culture and employee engagement Employee engagement fuels resilience. When people believe in the organization’s mission and trust leadership, they can overcome challenges together. Healthy cultures prioritize ongoing communication, employee recognition, and opportunities for providing feedback and feeling heard. When resilience is part of an organization’s culture, every hire becomes an opportunity to strengthen the team’s capability to navigate change. Adaptability and innovation Resilient organizations view change as an opportunity for growth rather than a threat to stability. They encourage continuous learning, experimentation without fear of failure, and cross-collaboration. When teams embed adaptability into their organization’s DNA, new ideas and improvements emerge naturally, even in uncertain times. Risk management and preparedness While it’s impossible to anticipate every disruption, resilient organizations prepare for the unexpected by identifying risks early and developing flexible response plans. Effective risk management fosters change readiness, encompassing organizational readiness, open attitudes toward change, and individual readiness. When challenges arise, resilient organizations can adjust course quickly and maintain momentum without losing sight of their business goals. Building Organizational Resilience Organizations build and strengthen resilience through deliberate actions, including developing the systems, skills, and structures that support adaptability. Here’s how: 1. Assess your organization’s current capabilities Conducting a thorough assessment of your organization’s strengths, opportunities, and change readiness provides baseline metrics of current resilience and identifies areas for focus. This includes evaluating leadership commitment, communication effectiveness, employee readiness, and the maturity of your change management practices. Change readiness is a strategic advantage for organizations of all kinds. 2. Develop crisis management plans Preparedness reduces uncertainty. Crises that have significant organizational impacts range from natural disasters and socio-cultural events to market shifts and economic downturns. Establishing crisis management and business continuity plans enables organizations to respond quickly and effectively when disruption occurs. The goal is not to create a perfectly laid-out plan, but rather to identify critical components, including key decision-makers, communication plans, and the proper course of action when managing rapid change in a crisis. 3. Invest in technology and infrastructure Having the right systems and technologies in place is a powerful enabler of resilience, especially during times of crisis. Modern, flexible systems support remote and hybrid work, data-driven decision-making, and cross-functional collaboration. That’s why many organizations are prioritizing digital transformations. Investing in an infrastructure that can scale, adapt, and help employees stay connected and operational under changing conditions is crucial for navigating the unexpected. 4. Train and empower employees Change is inevitable, but with the right approach, it’s always an opportunity. Ongoing training and skill development help employees build confidence in navigating change, solving problems, and adopting an open-minded approach to change. Empowered employees adapt to and drive change. When individuals feel equipped, trusted, and empowered, the organization as a whole becomes more capable of thriving in uncertain times, and the company develops strong human capital. Strategies for Sustaining Resilience Sustaining resilience requires ongoing attention and commitment beyond the initial stages of building the foundations. Resilient organizations view change as a constant and maintain their resilience by integrating learning, communication, and support into their daily operations. The following strategies help develop organizational resilience and human capital as a lasting capability: Strengthen communication and relationships with transparency and clarity Communication and trust are at the core of both successful change and sustained resilience. The Prosci ADKAR® Model – Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability and Reinforcement – puts people at the center of change and highlights clear, transparent, and consistent communication throughout every stage of the individual change process. Prosci ADKAR Model Strengthening communication channels between leaders, managers, and employees helps maintain alignment and engagement, especially during ongoing transformation, creating trusting relationships to navigate uncertainty together. Build strong relationships among teams to create a supportive network during times of change and transition. Implement robust support systems Robust support systems ensure that employees have the necessary resources to adapt successfully. Provide resources for employee well-being, such as mental health support and coaching. Develop a structured transition plan by following a change management framework, such as the Prosci Methodology, to guide employees through changes and ensure they have the necessary support and resources. Foster a culture of continuous learning Sustained resilience depends on an organization’s ability to learn quickly and adapt to the pace of change. Business leaders play a key role in fostering learning cultures by modeling curiosity, encouraging reflection, and celebrating growth and improvement. Encourage ongoing training and development to enhance skills related to adaptability and problem-solving. Additionally, embedding flexibility into daily operations, encouraging experimentation without fear of failure, and implementing feedback mechanisms ensure that learning occurs throughout the change process. Benefits of Organizational Resilience When organizations invest in building and sustaining resilience, they reap both short and long-term benefits, including: Enhanced adaptability to change – Organizations that prioritize resilience are better equipped to respond to challenges such as supply chain disruptions, talent shortages, and shifts in customer demand, all of which can have a lasting impact on operational continuity. Improved employee engagement and retention – A resilient organization fosters a supportive work environment with higher levels of engagement, job satisfaction, and loyalty, ultimately reducing turnover. Long-term competitive advantage – By effectively managing risks and capitalizing on opportunities, resilient organizations can outperform competitors and achieve long-term success. Challenges in Building Organizational Resilience While the value of organizational resilience is clear, achieving it can be a complex process. Many organizations face obstacles that limit their ability to respond effectively to change. Challenges to prepare for include: Resistance to change – Resistance is a natural human reaction to change. Prosci research shows that preventing resistance to change is more effective than addressing it reactively. Strong sponsorship, effective communication, and addressing cultural barriers can help mitigate resistance. Resource constraints – Competing priorities and teams stretched too thin often lead to change saturation, which occurs when disruptive changes exceed an organization’s capacity to adopt them. To overcome this, leaders must prioritize strategically, allocate resources intentionally, and integrate change management into existing processes rather than treating it as an add-on. Balancing stability and innovation – Organizations must find the right balance between stability and innovation that works best for their teams. Strengthening leadership alignment and organizational readiness ensures that innovation occurs within a framework that supports people through change, not one that overwhelms them. Case Studies in Building Organizational Resilience We have a philosophy of building organizational resilience to make you stronger for every future change. Here are some examples of how Prosci can help your organization become more resilient. Building organizational change capabilities following a crisis Following the COVID-19 pandemic, employees at The Washington State Department of Health faced overwhelming burnout, turnover, and change fatigue. With a focus on building executive commitment and support, creating lasting change management capabilities, and helping the department regain momentum, Prosci developed a comprehensive strategy to support these capabilities. This enabled the department to embed change management principles and processes into their daily work, building a change-ready team for the future. A more agile and resilient organization Oregon Lottery embarked on a transformational journey involving a series of significant change initiatives. By engaging Prosci as a trusted partner for change, delivering formal change management training to employees, and leveraging Prosci’s structured approach to change, Oregon Lottery became future-ready. The team encountered fewer barriers to adoption, achieved higher levels of employee participation and adoption of new systems, and achieved a 95% participation rate in their engagement survey. Organizational Resilience Best Practices and Key Takeaways The most resilient organizations take a strategic, intentional approach that weaves resilience into every layer of how they operate and lead change. They: Embed resilience into strategy – Integrate resilience thinking into strategic planning, risk management, and decision-making processes to embed it into the organization’s identity. Commit to continuous learning and adaptation – Encourage teams to evaluate outcomes to strengthen organizational change maturity and agility over time. Align resilience with organizational goals – When resilience initiatives align with what matters most to the business, they gain leadership support, employee buy-in, and measurable impact. Building Change-Ready Organizations for What’s Next Organizations that weave resilience into their strategy, culture, and leadership practices position themselves to thrive in the face of constant change. By equipping people with the necessary tools, mindsets, and support, leaders can transform uncertainty into opportunity. The future belongs to those who are change-ready.
Read story